How Long Does It Take For Gis Usps To Do A Background Check

Objective

During fiscal yr (FY) 2017 and 2018, the Mail service hired 165,543 employees nationwide. Applicants must complete the initial pre-screening process, which is the first stride in determining suitability for an initial chore offer. The pre-screening procedure includes conducting the interview, drug screening, and local criminal background check.

Upon acceptance of the job offering and to further assess suitability, the U.S. Postal Inspection Service conducts a more than in-depth background investigation called the National Bureau Check with Inquiries (NACI).

NACI investigations are conducted for all newly hired employees as function of the post-hiring process. Based on the NACI results, the Postal Service makes a last suitability decision and the employee is either retained or separated. During the hiring process, controls are implemented to help ensure that appropriate due diligence (reviews, approval certifications, justifications, etc.) is applied.

Our objective was to assess the U.S. Postal Service's employee background screening process to make up one's mind whether individuals selected for employment are suitable to maintain the rubber and security of the mail and uphold public trust in the Postal Service. Our focus was employees with either a criminal hit on the pre-screening assessment, or unfavorable NACI results.

We conducted a two-office statistical sample to review a total of 401 employees hired nationwide during FYs 2017 and 2018. The sample was comprised of:

Two hundred of five,269 employees who were hired with a criminal hit on their pre-screening background check; and

Two hundred and i of 6,273 employees who were hired and received an unfavorable NACI decision.

What the OIG Found

The Postal Service did not always adhere to background screening requirements in determining bidder suitability for employees with either a criminal hit on the pre-screening assessment, or unfavorable NACI results.

Of the employees we sampled who were hired with a criminal hit on their pre-screening background check:

Twenty-one percent (42 of 200), or one,106 projected over the universe, had no evidence of the required hiring approval certification.

Four percentage (seven of 200), or 211 projected over the universe, had no evidence of the required NACI investigation existence conducted. Ii individuals are currently employed with the Postal service, and five take separated from the agency.

Nosotros likewise identified:

Thirty-iv per centum (135 of 401) of the employees, or 3,902 projected over the universe, did not have a NACI Certificate of Completion maintained in their electronic Official Personnel Folders (eOPF), as required.

There are inconsistent practices among the districts related to making final suitability determinations and maintaining adequate justification documentation.

These conditions occurred because the current hiring process lacks controls to validate compliance with approval certification, NACI investigations, and eOPF requirements. Additionally, for employees who receive unfavorable NACI results, at that place are inconsistent practices among the districts related to making final suitability determination and maintaining justification documentation because there is no formal policy or procedure promoting consistent behaviors or desired actions of management.

Ineffective controls bear upon the assurance that objectives are being met, the reliability of information in the determination-making process, and compliance with policy. The control gaps identified in the hiring process increase the run a risk that employees are not existence fairly vetted for suitability and prevent timely identification of noncompliance with requirements.

What the OIG Recommended

We recommended management incorporate a review procedure to ensure compliance with prescribed requirements; incorporate procedures to heighten visibility in tracking and monitoring of NACI investigations; and conduct NACI investigations for the two active employees without prove of the investigation on file.

We also recommended management implement a review process to ensure validation that NACI Certificates of Completion are in employees' eOPFs; and institute a formal policy designating the authority to make final suitability determinations for employees who receive unfavorable NACI results.

Read full study